Sorrow Riddle
Online Riddle
FAQ
Szukaj
Użytkownicy
Grupy
Galerie
Rejestracja
Profil
Zaloguj się, by sprawdzić wiadomości
Zaloguj
Forum Sorrow Riddle Strona Główna
->
Forum testowe
Napisz odpowiedź
Użytkownik
Temat
Treść wiadomości
Emotikony
Więcej Ikon
Kolor:
Domyślny
Ciemnoczerwony
Czerwony
Pomarańćzowy
Brązowy
Żółty
Zielony
Oliwkowy
Błękitny
Niebieski
Ciemnoniebieski
Purpurowy
Fioletowy
Biały
Czarny
Rozmiar:
Minimalny
Mały
Normalny
Duży
Ogromny
Zamknij Tagi
Opcje
HTML:
NIE
BBCode
:
TAK
Uśmieszki:
TAK
Wyłącz BBCode w tym poście
Wyłącz Uśmieszki w tym poście
Kod potwierdzający: *
Wszystkie czasy w strefie EET (Europa)
Skocz do:
Wybierz forum
Jakaś kategoria
----------------
Forum testowe
Przegląd tematu
Autor
Wiadomość
zvswgogna
Wysłany: Pią 9:44, 13 Gru 2013
Temat postu: Talk of injunction on Bering Sea pollock fleet
Talk of injunction on Bering Sea pollock fleet
A couple days ago I noted that there has been a flurry of emails lately from leaders in Western Alaska talking about what to do about this year's strict limits on king salmon fishing on the Yukon River. Well, they're still coming, and people are talking about some major moves including calling for a freeze on the massive Bering Sea pollock fishery that Yukon River fishermen blame for dwindling king runs. Although a new cap on the number of king salmon wasted by the pollock fleet could take effect in a couple years, local fishermen who aren't allowed to fish are saying the bigmoney industry needs to do its part right now.
All this after last winter's high energy prices and the flooding this spring, not to mention a public hungry to debate Gov. Sarah Palin's decision making. Throw in simmering talk of protests by what amounts to civil disobedience over the limits on chinook fishing along the Yukon, and you've got the potential for real drama.
(Commercial and subsistence fishing for kings on the lower Yukon is currently closed because of the weak run. Current info on the Department of Fish and Game's Yukon Management Area page .)
Here are a couple more of the recent emails that debate the notion of staging something similar to the 1961 "duckin" in Barrow, where hunters protested laws that prohibited shooting waterfowl. Click here for some good background. The general idea is if regulators prohibit harvesting a subsistence food, do you ignore the rule and essentially force them to arrest the entire village? (And what if that happens what if everyone just went ahead and caught kings anyway, despite restrictions meant to build the runs for the future? Would that further cripple the fishery?)
I'm still away from work, by the way just wanted to share these emails. Let me know what I missed. I know there are other rural topics out there that need attention, but this is where the tension is right now:
I remember the Pt. Barrow bird event. It was a wellknown action that helped pave the way for hunting in the spring when we needed the fresh meat.
I do know that peaceful, nonviolent protest against our government is protected by our constitution, BUT ONLY after all legal, administrative, and other means have been exercised and failed.
We do know that people are barely hanging on and we are going to have a tough winter IF our federal, state, regional, and village leaders do not clearly understand that we cannot tolerate another winter of high cost fuel and electricity and watch the continuation of the taking of so many king salmon and other salmon in the Bering Sea Pollock Trawl fishery.
I hope that any decision to fish illegally will be decided by wise and sound counsel and due deliberation. This is not a step to be taken lightly.
At this point, I would advise against such action.
I know that there is little patience to wait for the results of seeking injunctive relief from our courts shutting down the Bering Sea Pollock Trawl fishery once king salmon bycatch reaches 5,000. I also know that village people are experiencing great difficulty having to pay very high prices for fuel to Subsistence hunt and fish.
Nevertheless, a suit seeking injunctive relief should be tried by our leaders.
Stop the Bering Sea Pollock Trawl Fishery once 5,000 king salmon were caught;
Provide sufficient compensation that would get the people who depend on the king salmon and other salmon through the winter;
Develop a plan that will get low cost fuel into our villages ASAP.
I don't know what has been done on our behalf legally, legislatively, or administratively to provide us immediate relief. Therefore, I cannot say with any degree of certainty that we have exhausted all avenues of redress and relief.
I hope our leaders will intervene before any further harm is done to our salmon resources by such a high bycatch cap on the Bering Sea and do no further damage to the fragile economies of our villages by having to pay for such high cost fuel and electricity,[url=http://www.xantrex.cc]louis vuitton outlet[/url].
Again, I hope that wise heads prevail and that our grievances will be heard and relief will come from our federal, state, regional, and village leaders before any action is taken that may not bring desired results.
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin